Council of Councils
Think Global Health
Online Store
International efforts, such as the Paris Agreement, aim to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. But experts say countries aren’t doing enough to limit dangerous global warming.
Drone Proliferation: Three Things to Know
June 19, 2014 11:48 am (EST)
- Explainer Video
The number of countries pursuing armed drone technology is growing, a trend that may increase the likelihood that some governments may resort to lethal force, especially at flashpoints for conflict like the Middle East and East Asia. Sarah Kreps, CFR’s Stanton Nuclear Security Fellow, offers three things to know about armed drone proliferation.
More From Our Experts
-
Unmanned Arms Race: Although only the United States, Israel, and the UK have used armed drones in combat, many other countries are acquiring this technology, explains Kreps. "In particular, China and Iran have touted their armed drone capabilities," she says, while several European, Middle Eastern and Asian countries are also developing, collaborating on, or purchasing drone systems similar to that of the United States.
-
Lower Conflict Threshold: The spread of drone technology, which does not place human pilots at risk, could lead some states to opt for lethal force more often. If other countries use drones similar to the way the United States has done in recent years, "we are likely to see states carrying out cross-border attacks less discriminately," says Kreps. This is highly likely in East Asia, the Middle East, the Caucasus, Africa and other flashpoints for conflict, she says.
-
Limiting Proliferation: The international transfer of armed drones is regulated by the Missile Technology Control Regime, forged in 1987. But the non-binding accord faces relevancy challenges, says Kreps, and many countries seeking armed drones are not members. In addition to adhering to the MTCR guidelines, Washington should reflect on the precedent it is setting and clarify its targeted killings policy for other countries to consider, she adds.
More From Our Experts
Top Stories on CFR
Liana Fix, a fellow for Europe at CFR, and Thomas Graham, a distinguished fellow at CFR, sit down with James M. Lindsay to discuss the future of U.S. policy toward Russia and the risks posed by heightened tensions between two nuclear powers. This episode is the first in a special TPI series on the U.S. 2024 presidential election and is supported by the Carnegie Corporation of New York.
Terrorism and Counterterrorism
Violence around U.S. elections in 2024 could not only destabilize American democracy but also embolden autocrats across the world. Jacob Ware recommends that political leaders take steps to shore up civic trust and remove the opportunity for violence ahead of the 2024 election season.
Those seeking to profit from fentanyl and governments seeking to control its supply are locked in a never-ending competition, with each new countermeasure spurring further innovation to circumvent it.